Matthew Chapter 1: 18-25 The King Revealed Part 2 February 11, 2009
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Gospels Bible Study, Matthew Bible Study.Tags: God, Jesus Christ, Matthew, The Bible, The Gospels, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
The Heritage of the King Part 2
18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. 19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. 20 But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. 21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.”
22 So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying: 23 “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.”
24 Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, 25 and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS.
Joseph is the foster father of Jesus and we begin with his being espoused or engaged to Mary. Yet there seems to be a problem, although they are engaged and probably had been for some time, meaning that they were separated for each other, Mary is found to be with child!!!!!
In their culture there were three relationships that a couple had, the engagement, the espousal, and the betrothal.
The Engagement
This could take place at any time in the child’s life, because marriage was mainly by arrangement and agreement through the parents. If the circumstances were right, and each family had children around the same time, and the parents agreed on the arrangement, then their children, regardless of age, were engaged to be married at a future date.
The Espousal
This is the beginning of the point of maturity where the two partied involved could be married. Usually this would be in the early teens, ending at around fifteen or sixteen for the girl. This is like what we know of as engagement today. The man and woman have accepted the agreement of their parents, and each other, and they will set themselves apart for each other. This separation would last for a year as they prepared and planned for their marriage. During this time they are considered married because the only way to break it is through a writ of divorcement
The Betrothal
The year of espousal is over and now the marriage begins. On the wedding night, the father would take the signs of his daughter’s virginity, the bedcovers, and keep them, in case there was a question as to whether she was actually a virgin or not.
This was something that the father did in order to protect his daughter and it must have happened a lot in order for this practice to be adopted.
It is during the espousal period that we find Joseph and Mary in these passages. Now take into consideration that they were separated, physically in order to prepare for their marriage and what has come up causes a great problem.
Mary is with child, she is pregnant!!!
We can learn a lot from how Joseph reacts to this situation.
Usually we think of Joseph as an older, less important character then Mary and we miss just what kind of person he was.
He was a moral merciful man
Under the Jewish law, this constituted infidelity, or adultery, and Mary could be stoned to death for such a betrayal to her husband. Joseph was in great turmoil. He must have loved her because he begins thinking of how to spare her the embarrassment and possible death.
He was a logical man
He could have chosen to divorce her publicly and made it well known that he had nothing to do with this child. He could have taken her to the town square and had her stoned to death. Yet he chose to do not the easiest but the right thing. Regardless of what people would whisper and gossip about them
He was a dreamer
The angel came to him and told him what God was doing. He listened and did as he was bidden. He didn’t just put it away from his mind either, he arose and took her to be his wife
The virgin birth was as hard to believe then as it has been these days by the scoffers. The enemies of Jesus knew, even when He began His earthly ministry that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding his parents
John 8
37 “I know that you are Abraham’s descendants, but you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. 38 I speak what I have seen with My Father, and you do what you have seen with your father.”
39 They answered and said to Him, “Abraham is our father.”
Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. 41 You do the deeds of your father.”
Then they said to Him, “We were not born of fornication; we have one Father—God.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me.
There were rumors everywhere even that Mary had become pregnant from a Roman soldier, but the record is set straight here in the Gospels. What strength these two precious people of God showed because it could not have been easy. They most assuredly would have been the object of ridicule, whispering, and gossip. All the while knowing the truth that no one would beleive
Matthew Chapter 1: 1-17 The King Revealed Part 1 February 11, 2009
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Gospels Bible Study, Matthew Bible Study.Tags: God, Jesus Christ, Matthew, The Bible, The Gospels, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
The Heritage of the King Part 1
1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham:
2 Abraham begot Isaac, Isaac begot Jacob, and Jacob begot Judah and his brothers. 3 Judah begot Perez and Zerah by Tamar, Perez begot Hezron, and Hezron begot Ram. 4 Ram begot Amminadab, Amminadab begot Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Salmon. 5 Salmon begot Boaz by Rahab, Boaz begot Obed by Ruth, Obed begot Jesse, 6 and Jesse begot David the king.
David the king begot Solomon by her who had been the wife of Uriah. 7 Solomon begot Rehoboam, Rehoboam begot Abijah, and Abijah begot Asa. 8 Asa begot Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat begot Joram, and Joram begot Uzziah. 9 Uzziah begot Jotham, Jotham begot Ahaz, and Ahaz begot Hezekiah. 10 Hezekiah begot Manasseh, Manasseh begot Amon, and Amon begot Josiah. 11 Josiah begot Jeconiah and his brothers about the time they were carried away to Babylon.
12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jeconiah begot Shealtiel, and Shealtiel begot Zerubbabel. 13 Zerubbabel begot Abiud, Abiud begot Eliakim, and Eliakim begot Azor. 14 Azor begot Zadok, Zadok begot Achim, and Achim begot Eliud. 15 Eliud begot Eleazar, Eleazar begot Matthan, and Matthan begot Jacob. 16 And Jacob begot Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, from David until the captivity in Babylon are fourteen generations, and from the captivity in Babylon until the Christ are fourteen generations.
Jesus Christ is the only One who has a complete history tracing His lineage here on the earth. This particular genealogy traces His lineage back through David and to Abraham, both placing Him as the seed of Abraham and in the kingly line of David through Joseph, His father through marriage. God promised David that someone from his family would reign over Israel FOREVER through his descendants.
1 Chronicles 17
God’s Covenant with David
1 Now it came to pass, when David was dwelling in his house, that David said to Nathan the prophet, “See now, I dwell in a house of cedar, but the ark of the covenant of the LORD is under tent curtains.”
2 Then Nathan said to David, “Do all that is in your heart, for God is with you.”
3 But it happened that night that the word of God came to Nathan, saying, 4 “Go and tell My servant David, ‘Thus says the LORD: “You shall not build Me a house to dwell in. 5 For I have not dwelt in a house since the time that I brought up Israel, even to this day, but have gone from tent to tent, and from one tabernacle to another. 6 Wherever I have moved about with all Israel, have I ever spoken a word to any of the judges of Israel, whom I commanded to shepherd My people, saying, ‘Why have you not built Me a house of cedar?’”’ 7 Now therefore, thus shall you say to My servant David, ‘Thus says the LORD of hosts: “I took you from the sheepfold, from following the sheep, to be ruler over My people Israel. 8 And I have been with you wherever you have gone, and have cut off all your enemies from before you, and have made you a name like the name of the great men who are on the earth. 9 Moreover I will appoint a place for My people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own and move no more; nor shall the sons of wickedness oppress them anymore, as previously, 10 since the time that I commanded judges to be over My people Israel. Also I will subdue all your enemies. Furthermore I tell you that the LORD will build you a house. 11 And it shall be, when your days are fulfilled, when you must go to be with your fathers, that I will set up your seed after you, who will be of your sons; and I will establish his kingdom. 12 He shall build Me a house, and I will establish his throne forever. 13 I will be his Father, and he shall be My son; and I will not take My mercy away from him, as I took it from him who was before you. 14 And I will establish him in My house and in My kingdom forever; and his throne shall be established forever.”’”
From that time forward, a descendant of David through Solomon’s branch would sit on the throne as King of Israel – but 400 or so years later, around the time of the Babylonian captivity this line of kings had become so evil and wicked that God had endured enough and He cursed the royal line declaring that no son of the present king would ever reign over Israel again
Jeremiah 22
24 “As I live,” says the LORD, “though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the signet on My right hand, yet I would pluck you off; 25 and I will give you into the hand of those who seek your life, and into the hand of those whose face you fear—the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and the hand of the Chaldeans. 26 So I will cast you out, and your mother who bore you, into another country where you were not born; and there you shall die. 27 But to the land to which they desire to return, there they shall not return.
28 “ Is this man Coniah a despised, broken idol—
A vessel in which is no pleasure?
Why are they cast out, he and his descendants,
And cast into a land which they do not know?
29 O earth, earth, earth,
Hear the word of the LORD!
30 Thus says the LORD:
‘ Write this man down as childless,
A man who shall not prosper in his days;
For none of his descendants shall prosper,
Sitting on the throne of David,
And ruling anymore in Judah.’”
Joseph was in this line of dethroned kings that come out of Judah, which places Jesus physically in the line of Judah even if it is from marriage
And it proves that God has always had a different idea
25 ‘Now to you, O profane, wicked prince of Israel, whose day has come, whose iniquity shall end, 26 thus says the Lord GOD:
Ezekiel 21
“ Remove the turban, and take off the crown;
Nothing shall remain the same.
Exalt the humble, and humble the exalted.
27 Overthrown, overthrown,
I will make it overthrown!
It shall be no longer,
Until He comes whose right it is,
And I will give it to Him.”’
This declaration comes to pass from the appearance of Gabriel to Mary before our Saviors birth
Luke 1
30 Then the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. 31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. 33 And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.”
And this will come to pass in the future physically with the return of Jesus Christ
Matthew 25:31 (New King James Version)
31 “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory.
Zechariah 14
4 And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives,
Which faces Jerusalem on the east.
And the Mount of Olives shall be split in two,
From east to west,
Making a very large valley;
Half of the mountain shall move toward the north
And half of it toward the south.
5 Then you shall flee through My mountain valley,
For the mountain valley shall reach to Azal.
Yes, you shall flee
As you fled from the earthquake
In the days of Uzziah king of Judah.
Thus the LORD my God will come,
And all the saints with You.
6 It shall come to pass in that day
That there will be no light;
The lights will diminish.
7 It shall be one day
Which is known to the LORD—
Neither day nor night.
But at evening time it shall happen
That it will be light.
8 And in that day it shall be
That living waters shall flow from Jerusalem,
Half of them toward the eastern sea
And half of them toward the western sea;
In both summer and winter it shall occur.
9 And the LORD shall be King over all the earth.
In that day it shall be—
“ The LORD is one,”
And His name one.
But how do we tie Jesus Christ physically to Joseph and Mary?
Some say that we can tie Jesus to Mary through the book of Luke Chapter 3. This particular genealogy traces the kingly line through Nathan, another son of David, and it goes past Abraham and reaches back to Adam
Luke 3
23 Now Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, 24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Janna, the son of Joseph, 25 the son of Mattathiah, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of Esli, the son of Naggai, 26 the son of Maath, the son of Mattathiah, the son of Semei, the son of Joseph, the son of Judah, 27 the son of Joannas, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri, 28 the son of Melchi, the son of Addi, the son of Cosam, the son of Elmodam, the son of Er, 29 the son of Jose, the son of Eliezer, the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, 30 the son of Simeon, the son of Judah, the son of Joseph, the son of Jonan, the son of Eliakim, 31 the son of Melea, the son of Menan, the son of Mattathah, the son of Nathan, the son of David, 32 the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, the son of Salmon, the son of Nahshon, 33 the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram, the son of Hezron, the son of Perez, the son of Judah, 34 the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of Nahor, 35 the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the son of Shelah, 36 the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech, 37 the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel, the son of Cainan, 38 the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
Jesus Christ is King of Kings
He is fully God – He is deity
He is fully man – He is the God-Man, He is flesh and blood
He is the King of Kings
Although Jesus grew just like any other baby, He is the only exception that ever existed
He was different. He was not genetically related to either Mary or Joseph.
How do we know?
Jesus Christ is sinless and both of his parents were under sin
Jesus Christ was a special creation, just like Adam, born with no physical mother or father although He had to be born under the Law as a Man
Galatians 4
4 But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, 5 to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.
Philippians 2
5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7 but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. 9 Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Hebrews 5
So also Christ did not glorify Himself to become High Priest, but it was He who said to Him:
“ You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You.”
6 As He also says in another place:
“ You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek”;
7 who, in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, 8 though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. 9 And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him, 10 called by God as High Priest “according to the order of Melchizedek,” 11 of whom we have much to say, and hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing.
Hebrews 6
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil, 20 where the forerunner has entered for us, even Jesus, having become High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 7
1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, 2 to whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all, first being translated “king of righteousness,” and then also king of Salem, meaning “king of peace,” 3 without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remains a priest continually.
4 Now consider how great this man was, to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils. 5 And indeed those who are of the sons of Levi, who receive the priesthood, have a commandment to receive tithes from the people according to the law, that is, from their brethren, though they have come from the loins of Abraham; 6 but he whose genealogy is not derived from them received tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises. 7 Now beyond all contradiction the lesser is blessed by the better. 8 Here mortal men receive tithes, but there he receives them, of whom it is witnessed that he lives. 9 Even Levi, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, so to speak, 10 for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him.
Need for a New Priesthood
11 Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law. 13 For He of whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no man has officiated at the altar.
14 For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And it is yet far more evident if, in the likeness of Melchizedek, there arises another priest 16 who has come, not according to the law of a fleshly commandment, but according to the power of an endless life. 17 For He testifies:
“ You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek.”
18 For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness, 19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is thebringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.
Greatness of the New Priest
20 And inasmuch as He was not made priest without an oath 21 (for they have become priests without an oath, but He with an oath by Him who said to Him:
“ The LORD has sworn
And will not relent,
‘ You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek’”),
Just like the first Adam, Jesus had no physical mother or father, only God, thus no sin nature, no inherited sin, no sinful flesh.
He was absolutely pure and without sin
Without blemish or spot
John 1:29
29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!
Jesus Christ is God
He is fully God
He is the Son of God
He is the Image of God
He is the Form of God
He is equal with God
He is God in the flesh
Introduction to the Gospels Part 2: The Gospel of Matthew January 21, 2009
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Gospels Bible Study.Tags: God, Jesus Christ, John, Luke, Mark, Matthew, The Bible, The Gospels, The Holy Spirit, The Story of Jesus
add a comment
Matthew – He gives us the portrait of Christ as the King.
His book references the first creature mentioned in Ezekiel 1 and Revelation 4:6-10 – Lionlike
His style – A teacher
His audience – The Jewish people
His emphasis – The sermons of Jesus
His book contains a genealogical record because a King must have one
Matthew was a tax collector
He was a Roman/Jewish citizen because he was also known as Levi.
He had a great appreciation for Jesus
Tax collectors were hated in those days for two distinct reasons.
- They worked for Rome.
- They were considered dishonest people.
Each collector had been given a quota of what and how much he was to collect and only he knew what that quota was. They were allowed by Rome to keep whatever they collected above and beyond that quota, so many collectors were wealthy.
Thus we can assume that Matthew was exactly what we have described: A very wealthy collector
One day Jesus Christ came into his life and uttered two words that would change Matthew’s life forever.
Follow Me!!!
Matthew opened his heart
He immediately got up and he followed Jesus. Once a collector had abandoned his post, he would never be allowed to take it back up. I would imagine there would be lines upon lines of others just waiting to take his place so this meant much more that just a decision. Matthew would leave everything that he knew behind.
He saw the Savior and followed His Word
Matthew opened his home
He had a party for all his friends so that they could meet this Jesus. He knew that everyone needed what Jesus had to offer.
Matthew opened his hands
He wrote about Jesus. Each of the Gospels was written with a specific audience and Matthew was written with the Jews in mind. This shows here in the beginning of the book with the genealogy of Jesus
Why?
Because a King must have one!
A King MUST have a pedigree and Matthew launches right away and gives us what we need in order to see Him as King.
Jesus relates to the Jews racially, through Abraham
And in Royalty – He is also a son of David
Jesus Christ comes from the line of David; the King of the Jewish people and therefore Jesus was in line to take the throne. The Jewish people were obsessed with keeping up with genealogies (for this purpose) and interestingly enough, because of Matthew, and because all the early records were destroyed by Rome, Jesus is the only Jewish male to actually have His lineage recorded in total.
This book is a topical book and not a chronological
There are 5 main sections in this Gospel:
- The King Revealed
Chapters 1-10
- The King Resisted
Chapters 11-13
- The King Retreated
Chapters 14-20
- The King Rejected
Chapters 21-27
- The King Resurrected
Chapter 28
Introduction to the Gospels Part 1 January 21, 2009
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Gospels Bible Study.Tags: God, Jesus Christ, John, Luke, Mark, Matthew, The Bible, The Gospels, The Holy Spirit, The story of Jesus Christ
add a comment
Source: Wikipedia
The word gospel derives from the Old English god-spell (rarely godspel), meaning “good tidings” or “good news”. It is a calque (word-for-word translation) of the Greek word εὐαγγέλιον, euangelion (eu- “good”, -angelion “message”). The Greek word “euangelion” is also the source of the term “evangelist” in English. The authors of the four canonical Christian gospels are known as the four evangelists.
Of the many gospels written in antiquity, only four gospels came to be accepted as part of the New Testament, or canonical. An insistence upon there being a canon of canonical four, and no others, was a central theme of Irenaeus of Lyons, c. 185. In his central work, Adversus Haereses Irenaeus denounced various early Christian groups that used only one gospel, such as Marcionism which used only Marcion’s version of Luke, or the Ebionites which seem to have used an Aramaic version of Matthew as well as groups that embraced the texts of newer revelations, such as the Valentinians (A.H. 1.11). Irenaeus declared that the four he espoused were the four Pillars of the Church: “it is not possible that there can be either more or fewer than four” he stated, presenting as logic the analogy of the four corners of the earth and the four winds (3.11.8). His image, taken from Ezekiel 1, or Revelation 4:6-10, of God’s throne borne by four creatures with four faces—”the four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion, on the right side: and the four had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle”—equivalent to the “four-formed” gospel, is the origin of the conventional symbols of the Evangelists: lion, bull, eagle, man. Irenaeus was ultimately successful in declaring that the four gospels collectively, and exclusively these four, contained the truth. By reading each gospel in light of the others, Irenaeus made of John a lens through which to read Matthew, Mark and Luke.
By the turn of the 5th century, the Catholic Church in the west, under Pope Innocent I, recognized a biblical canon including the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, which was previously established at a number of regional Synods, namely the Council of Rome (382), the Synod of Hippo (393), and two Synods of Carthage (397 and 419). This canon, which corresponds to the modern Catholic canon, was used in the Vulgate, an early 5th century translation of the Bible made by Jerome under the commission of Pope Damasus I in 382.
- Gospel according to Matthew
- Gospel according to Mark
- Gospel according to Luke
- Gospel according to John
There was also another order, the “western order of the Gospels”, so called because it is typical for the manuscripts which are usually a representative of the Western text-type.
- Gospel according to Matthew
- Gospel according to John
- Gospel according to Luke
- Gospel according to Mark
This order is found in the following manuscripts: Bezae, Monacensis, Washingtonianus, Tischendorfianus IV, Uncial 0234.
Medieval copies of the four canonical gospels are known as Gospel Books or also simply as Gospels (in Greek as Tetraevangelia). Notable examples include the Lindisfarne Gospels (c 700), the Barberini Gospels, Lichfield Gospels and the Vienna Coronation Gospels (8th century), the Book of Kells and the Ada Gospels (ca. 800) or the Ebbo Gospels (9th century).
Non-canonical gospels
Main article: New Testament apocrypha
In addition to the four canonical gospels, early Christians wrote other gospels that were not accepted into the canon. Generally these were not accepted due to doubt over the authorship, the time frame between the original writing and the events described, or content that was at odds with orthodoxy. For example, if a gospel claimed to be written by James, yet was authored in the second century, clearly authorship was not authentic. This differs from the four canonical gospels which historians agree were authored before 100. For this reason, most of these non-canonical texts were only ever accepted by small portions of the early Christian community. Some of the content of these non-canonical gospels (as much as it deviates from accepted theological norms) is considered heretical by the leadership of mainstream churches, including the Vatican.
The sayings gospel Q
Main article: Q document
The hypothetical gospel Q comprised mostly sayings of Jesus with little narrative. It is presumably the source for many of Jesus’ sayings in Matthew and Luke, and accordingly must have preceded these gospels. It first edition was written c 50-60.
Gospel of Thomas
Main article: Gospel of Thomas
Like Q, the gospel attributed to Thomas is mostly wisdom without narrating Jesus’ life. Some scholars argue that its first edition was written c 50-60, but that the surviving edition was written in the first half of the second century. This would mean that its first edition was contemporary with the earliest letters of Paul the Apostle. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church says that the original may date from c. 150. It may represent a tradition independent from the canonical gospels, but that developed over a long time and was influenced by Matthew and Luke. While it can be understood in Gnostic terms, it lacks the characteristic features of Gnostic doctrine. The Jesus Seminar identified two of its unique parables, the parable of the empty jug and the parable of the assassin. It had been lost but was discovered, in a Coptic version dating from c. 350, at Nag Hammadi in 1945-6, and three papyri, dated to c. 200, which contain fragments of a Greek text similar to but not identical with that in the Coptic language, have also been found.
Gospel of Peter
Main article: Gospel of Peter
The gospel of Peter was likely written c 50-100 or in the first half of the second century. It seems to be largely legendary, hostile toward Jews, and including Docetic elements. It had been lost but was rediscovered in the 19th century.
Infancy Gospels
Main article: Infancy gospel
A genre of “Infancy gospels” (Greek: protoevangelion) arose in the 2nd century, such as the Gospel of James, which introduces the concept of the Perpetual Virginity of Mary, and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (not to be confused with the absolutely different sayings Gospel of Thomas), both of which related many miraculous incidents from the life of Mary and the childhood of Jesus that are not included in the canonical gospels, but which have passed into Christian lore.
Harmonies
Main article: Gospel harmony
Another genre that has been suppressed is that of Gospel harmonies, in which the apparent discrepancies in the canonical four gospels were selectively recast to present a harmoniously consistent narrative text. Very few fragments of harmonies survived. The Diatessaron was such a harmonization, compiled by Tatian around 175. It was popular for at least two centuries in Syria, but eventually it fell into disuse.
Marcion’s gospel of Luke
Marcion of Sinope, c. 150, had a version of the Gospel of Luke which differed substantially from that which has now become the standard text. Marcion’s version was far less Jewish than the now canonical text, and his critics alleged that he had edited out the portions he didn’t like from the canonical version, though Marcion argued that his text was the more genuinely original one. Marcion also rejected all the other gospels, including Matthew, Mark and especially John, which he alleged had been forged by Irenaeus.
Gospel of Judas
Main article: Gospel of Judas
The Gospel of Judas is another controversial and ancient text that purports to tell the story of the gospel from the perspective of Judas, the disciple who betrayed Jesus. It paints an unusual picture of the relationship between Jesus and Judas. The text was recovered from a cave in Egypt by a thief and thereafter sold on the black market until it was finally discovered by a collector who, with the help of academics from Yale and Princeton, were able to verify its authenticity. The document itself does not claim to have been authored by Judas (it is, rather, a Gospel about Judas), and dates no earlier than the second century.
We will begin these studies with trying to actually break them down first as to various points, such as style, characteristic, and audience. It also seems practical to do two studies at once, the first will break down each Gospel into its various subtexts and themes for each book individually. Then a study that harmonizes the four Gospels together, relying on the suggestion of Irenaeus and using the book of John as a filter to read each of the 3 Synoptic Gospels to tell the full story of Jesus Christ.
We will also be borrowing his iconic usage of the angelic beings in Scripture because they acurately show the nature of each book.
The Gospels as a whole
Matthew – He gives us the portrait of Christ as the King.
His book references the first creature – Lionlike
His style – A teacher
His audience – The Jewish people
His emphasis – The sermons of Jesus
His book contains a genealogical record because a King must have one
Mark – He gives us the portrait of Christ the Servant
His book references the second creature – Oxlike
His style – A preacher
His audience – The Romans
His emphasis – The miracles of Jesus
His book does not contain a geneology because a servant doesn’t need one
Luke – He gives us the portrait of Christ the Perfect Man
His book references the third creature – Manlike
His style – A historian
His audience – The Greeks
His emphasis – The parables of Jesus
His book contains a genealogical record because a Perfect Man has one
John – He gives us the portrait of Christ the Mighty God
His book refences the fourth creature – Eaglelike
His style – A theologian
His audience – The world
His emphasis – The doctrine of Jesus
His book contains no genealogical record because God does not have one
Matthew, Mark, and Luke strss the humanity of Jesus
John stresses His deity