Genesis 9 v24-27 – The Sons of Noah
24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
1. Concerning Ham and Canaan
25And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Canaan would be in general, a servant of the seed of Shem and Japheth.
Joshua, David, and Solomon (descendants of Shem) subdued them.
Alexander the Great and the Romans (descendants of Japheth) subdued them.
The Hamitic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s well-being
2) They are responsible for the technical proficiency of mankind
Arthur C. Custance states that all the earliest civilizations of note were founded and carried to the highest technical proficiency by the Hamitic peoples
Vol.1: Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions
PART IV
THE TECHNOLOGY OF HAMITIC PEOPLE
Publishing History:
1960 Doorway paper No. 43, published privately by Arthur C. Custance
1975 Part IV in Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions, vol.1 in The Doorway Papers Series,
1997 Arthur Custance Online Library (html)
2001 2nd Online Edition (corrections, design revisions)
INTRODUCTION
IF YOU enjoy reading catalogues now and then, you will probably enjoy this Paper, although it is dull indeed if read merely as literature. But if treated as intended, namely, as a list of technical achievements, it may come as a surprise to find how many, how varied, and how fundamental have been the inventions of Hamitic people, and how great a service they have rendered to mankind in the field of technology.
Hitherto our ethnocentrism in the writing of history has obscured this fact, but we now have a sufficient and ever-growing body of documented materials to justify this presentation.
Some of these achievements may be considered slight by those who have never actually contributed anything new to the sum total of human invention. But one should not be deceived by simplicity: it may be the hallmark of genius. It could also be argued that if we can only point to one invention of note in some particular tribe, that people can hardly be termed inventive. However, if we have only mentioned one invention that does not mean it was their sole achievement. It was mentioned only because it illustrated a particular aspect of native ingenuity.
2. Concerning Shem
26And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
Here we see a special favor given to Shem’s descendants, beginning with Abraham and ending with the greatest blessing – Jesus Christ!!!
The Semitic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s spiritual well-being
2) They are responsible for developing the major religions
At least three of the major religions spring out of Shem – Judaism, Islamism, and Christianity
3. Concerning Japheth
27God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
The Japhetic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s mental well-being.
2) They are responsible for the scientific development of mankind especially in the area of philosophy
Since 539 B.C., with the defeat of the Babylonians by Cyrus the Great, no Semetic or Hamitic race has succeeded in breaking the world supremacy of the Japhethic race
Romans 11
13For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
14If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them.
15For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
16For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.
17And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.
20Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.
24For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?
25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Here are some other things worth mentioning per Arthur Custance
Part I: The Part Played by Shem, Ham and Japheth in Subsequent World History
Chapter 1
The Threefold Framework as Reflected in Scripture
1. Abraham’s Three Wives
Abraham had three wives. The first was Sarah, a daughter of Shem (Genesis11:29). The second was Hagar, the Egyptian, a daughter of Ham (Genesis16:3). The third was Keturah (Genesis 25:1). According to Hebrew tradition (presumably based upon genealogical records preserved in the Temple prior to their destruction by fire in A.D. 70, records which were priceless to the Jewish people, particularly where Abraham was concerned), Keturah (4) was descended in the line of Japheth.
It may be pointed out that in Genesis 10 the sons of Noah when grouped together are habitually put in the same order — Shem, Ham, and Japheth — although it is not absolutely certain that this is the order in which they were born. As will be seen with reference to Abraham’s wives, this order is preserved. The implication of Scripture seems to be that in Abraham, the father of the faithful and the father of many nations, the whole race was in a unique way united into a single family. The subsequent events of Hagar’s life in no way alter the fact that she had become a wife to Abraham.
2. The Three Synoptic Gospels
In the New Testament recognition of this threefold division is consistently accorded. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are termed synoptic because they deal with the events of our Lord’s life in a way quite distinct from the Gospel of John. It has always been recognized that these three Gospels form a mosaic.
It has been observed from the time of the earliest commentaries that Matthew presents a picture of the Lord Jesus Christ as King, and wrote his Gospel primarily with the Jewish people in mind. The opening genealogy traces this King, appropriately, back to David and to Abraham. His Gospel is full of references to the Old Testament and continually points out how this or that event was a fulfilment of prophecy. This was a message directed primarily to the children of Shem.
Remembering the order in which the sons of Noah are always given, one might logically expect that the second Gospel, Mark’s, was directed to the children of Ham. We believe that it is. In considering this aspect of the subject, it is very easy to introduce the ideal of racial superiority, for Mark wrote his Gospel with the clear intent of portraying our Lord as a Servant of mankind. In doing this, he may either be thought to have degraded the Lord to the level of a servant or elevated the servant to the position of God’s Anointed. The former view which seems the most obvious, is most false. One is reminded of Luther’s hymn, which points out that he who sweeps a floor as unto the Lord makes both the floor and the action “fine.” This is a wonderful truth. That the children of Ham have been servants par excellence to mankind (5) — have in fact habitually served mankind better than they served themselves — is not to degrade them but to acknowledge a debt which we, with our ethnocentric pride, have been slow to admit. As we have already said, this is a point to be considered more fully.
That Mark wrote from this point of view seems clear. There is no genealogy of the Lord. A servant is known by his service, not by his pedigree. Mark is full of such phrases as immediately, straightway, forthwith, etc. This Man commanded power. It is a striking thing that the gods of Hamitic people on the whole were gods of power, whereas the God of Shem was pre-eminently moral, and the gods of Japheth were gods of illumination. Mark’s Gospel is a Gospel of doing, of ceaseless activity. There are some references to the sublime position of a servant which are not found in the other Gospels. (6) Here and there Mark refers to people as servants where the other Gospels omit the fact, and Mark himself is singled out elsewhere as of particular service to Paul.
Luke’s Gospel was clearly written for the Gentiles. It appears traditionally that the term Gentile was reserved for the children of Japheth. This is reflected in Genesis 10:5, which we shall examine a little more fully subsequently. In Genesis 9:27 the text reads, “God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem.” This occurred when the Jewish people committed national suicide by rejecting their King. The Kingdom was taken from them (Matthew 21:43) and the responsibility for its administration was given to Japheth. But this is a temporary arrangement, and when “the times of the Gentiles” (Luke 21:24) are fulfilled, the original division of responsibilities will be restored.
Luke wrote for these Gentiles. Being himself Greek, this was an appropriate divine appointment. In his Gospel, the genealogy of the Lord, quite properly, goes back to Adam, and the characteristic delineation of the Lord is as “Son of Man.”
5. Servant of Servants: for evidence that this phrase is not one of degradation as commonly assumed, see “Why Noah Cursed Canaan Instead of Ham”, Part III in Noah’s Three Sons, vol.1 in The Doorway Papers Series. LINK
6. Mark’s unique reference to the place of “service,” is found in Mark 10:44. He himself is referred to as a particularly valuable minister, by Paul in 2 Timothy 4:11.
It is also worthy of note that the name Japheth means “fair” or “light,” as the word Ham means “dark” (not necessarily black). The word Luke also means “fair” or “light.”
So we have three synoptic Gospels which, by many internal evidences far too numerous to enter into here, seem clearly to have been written under divine direction specifically for Shem, Ham, and Japheth ? in this order. It is not certain, of course, that the actual text of each Gospel was completed in this chronological order, but the fact remains that God has seen to it that they should be preserved for us from the earliest times in the order in which we find them today. There is no direct evidence, as far as I know, that the writers or the receivers were conscious of this association, but the association surely is clear.
