Genesis Chapter 10: The Table of Nations Part 3 December 2, 2008
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Genesis Bible Study.Tags: Genesis, Genesis 10, Genesis Bible Study, God, Ham, Japheth, Jesus Christ, Shem, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
Genesis 10 – The Table of Nations Part 3
The Descendants of Shem
21Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born.
22The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram.
23And the children of Aram; Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Mash.
24And Arphaxad begat Salah; and Salah begat Eber.
25And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
26And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,
27And Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklah,
28And Obal, and Abimael, and Sheba,
29And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab: all these were the sons of Joktan.
30And their dwelling was from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar a mount of the east.
31These are the sons of Shem, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations.
32These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
1 Chronicles 1
17The sons of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.
18And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.
19And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother’s name was Joktan.
20And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,
21Hadoram also, and Uzal, and Diklah,
22And Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,
23And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan.
24Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,
25Eber, Peleg, Reu,
26Serug, Nahor, Terah,
27Abram; the same is Abraham.
28The sons of Abraham; Isaac, and Ishmael.
Abraham comes from the lineage of Eber, or where the name “Hebrew” comes from. Eber means “crossing over” and his descendants would cross over into Canaan more than once.
Here we see the beginning of the Nation of Israel and the Hebrew people through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the Middle- Eastern countries through Abraham, Ishmael, and E
Genesis Chapter 10: The Table of Nations Part 2 December 2, 2008
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Genesis Bible Study.Tags: Genesis, Genesis 10, Genesis Bible Study, God, Ham, Japheth, Jesus Christ, Shem, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
Genesis 10 – The Table of Nations Part 2
The Descendants of Ham
6And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.
7And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtechah: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.
8And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
9He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.
10And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.
11Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,
12And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city.
13And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,
14And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim.
15And Canaan begat Sidon his first born, and Heth,
16And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,
17And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
18And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.
19And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.
20These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.
Now we get a glimpse of the sons of Japheth and we watch as his descendants spread from Africa to possibly China. We also see the birth of a picture of the coming Anti – Christ and a perverse and horrible people.
1 Chronicles 1
8The sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.
9And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecha. And the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.
10And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty upon the earth.
11And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,
12And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.
13And Canaan begat Zidon his firstborn, and Heth,
14The Jebusite also, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,
15And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
16And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.
Cush – This is modern day Ethiopia
Mizraim – Egypt
Phut – This is Africa or Lybia
Canaan – A perverse and wicked people, who received the curse of Noah. His people would become servants and they would occupy what would one day become the land of Israel. God gave them 4 centuries to repent from their horrible and perverse ways but they did not and were destroyed.
Genesis 15
13And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years;
14And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance.
15And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age.
16But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.
Sheba and Dedan – Saudi Arabia
Sidon – Phoenicia
Heth – Hittites
Jebus – The Jebusites occupied Jerusalem before David’s reign
Philistim – The Philistines
Sin – The possible founder of the Oriental race – China, Japan, India, etc
Nimrod – The founder of Babylon and Assyria. Two nations that would really cause trouble later on for Israel. Nimrod’s name means “rebel” and he was a prototype of the ultimate rebel – the Anti-Christ, who some believe will be based out of the revised Roman Empire or the European Union.
The Anti-Christ will seek to create a one-world government and usher in a one-world religion. Many believe that Nimrod began this religion.
8And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
The Anti-Christ will be a charismatic leader. He will be very, very persuasive and he will become mighty, or powerful. Nimrod amazed and confounded people.
9He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.
Some believe that this should say – “A mighty hunter against the Lord” or “in the face of the Lord” as in rebelliousness or mocking
Meaning that Nimrod hunted more than animals, he hunted the souls of man. Nimrod became a leader in apostasy, developer of a great religious system later to become known as the Babylonian religious system or the “mystery Babylon”.
Notes from the church fathers:
Fallen angels taught men the use of magical incantations that would force demons to obey man. After the flood Ham the son of Noah unhappily discovered this and taught it to his sons. This became ingrained into the Egyptians, Persians, and Babylonians. Ham died shortly after the fall of the Tower of Babel. Nimrod, called Ninus by the Greeks, was handed this knowledge and by it caused men to go away from the worship of god and go into diverse and erratic superstitions and began to be governed by the signs in the stars and motions of the planets. Taken from Recognitions of Clement 4.26-29.
Here is some information from the book “The Two Babylons”
‘The Two Babylon’s, was written by the late Reverend Alexander Hislop in pamphlet form in Edinburgh in 1853, greatly expanded 5 years later and has since appeared in many editions in both Great Britain and the United States. This book is considered by many Christians to be a/the classic in apologetics.’
‘See how a religion that was started by Nimrod and his wife spread to various regions, taking on different names, but keeping the same pagan rituals and trappings. These same rituals embody the Catholic church of today.’
Many have taught that Semiramus was the wife of Nimrod and Tammuz was said to be their son, as was chronicled in the Two (2) Babylon’s by Alexander Hislop.
Hislop identified Nimrod with the Mesopotamian ruler Ninus. Based on this supposed connection, and on selected readings of the older legends, he created a new image of Nimrod as a central part of his theory that the Roman Catholic Church grew from Babylonian paganism. A summary of his ideas follows:
According to ancient Egyptian and Babylonian traditions, his mother was Semiramis; sometimes Semiramis is referred to as the mother of Nimrod, and sometimes as his wife, leading to the belief that Nimrod married his mother. Also according to these traditions, Semiramis, who rose to greatness because of her son, was presented with a difficulty when her son died, so instead she pronounced him to be a god, so that she herself would become a goddess.
One story says that after Nimrod was killed, Semiramis claimed that an evergreen tree sprouted from a tree stump, which she said indicated the entry of new life into the deceased Nimrod; every year on the anniversary of Nimrod’s birth (December 25) they would leave gifts at this evergreen tree. This is presented by some as a possible explanation the origin of the Christmas tree.
Even though Semiramis claimed to be a virgin she had another son, named Tammuz, who she said was the reincarnation of Nimrod. She became known as the “Virgin Mother”, “Holy Mother” and the “Queen of Heaven” and was symbolized by the Moon. So began the worship of Semiramis and the child-god, and the whole paraphernalia of the Babylonian religious system.
After the decline of Babylon, the religion was transported to Egypt where the people worshipped Isis and her son Osiris (otherwise known as Horus). The same mother and child deities appeared in Pagan Rome as Fortuna and Jupiter, and in Greece as Ceres, the Great Mother, with the babe at her breast, or as Irene, the goddess of Peace, with the boy Plutus in her arms.
Nimrod was said to be Ninus and later Baal?
Some writers claim that Nimrod was slain by Shem his great-uncle, because of his unrighteousness. Others say he was beheaded by Esau the son of Abraham.
‘Nimrod was slain by Esau, between whom and himself jealousy existed owing to the fact that they were both hunters (Targ. pseudo-Jonathan to Gen. xxv. 27; “Sefer ha-Yashar,” section “Toledot,” p. 40b; Pirḳe R. El. l.c.; comp. Gen. R. lxv. 12).
The punishment visited on the builders of the tower did not cause Nimrod to change his conduct; he remained an idolater. He particularly persecuted Abraham, who by his command was thrown into a heated furnace; and it was on this account, according to one opinion, that Nimrod was called “Amraphel” ( = “he said, throw in”; Targ. pseudo-Jonathan to Gen. xiv. 1; Gen. R. xlii. 5; Cant. R. viii. 8).
Nimrod was informed that Abraham had come forth from the furnace uninjured, he remitted his persecution of the worshiper of the Creator of all things, weh; but on the following night he saw in a dream a man coming out of the furnace and advancing toward him with a drawn sword. Nimrod thereupon ran away, but the man threw an egg at him; this was afterward transformed into a large river in which all his troops were drowned, only he himself and three of his followers escaping.
Then the river again became an egg, and from the latter came forth a small fowl, which flew at Nimrod and pecked out his eye. The dream was interpreted as forecasting Nimrod’s defeat by Abraham, wherefore Nimrod sent secretly to kill Abraham; but the latter emigrated with his family to the land of Canaan.
Ten years later Nimrod came to wage war with Chedorlaomer, King of Elam, who had been one of Nimrod’s generals, and who after the dispersion of the builders of the tower went to Elam and formed there an independent kingdom. Nimrod at the head of an army set out with the intention of punishing his rebellious general, but the latter routed him. Nimrod then became a vassal of Chedorlaomer, who involved him in the war with the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah, with whom he was defeated by Abraham (“Sefer ha-Yashar,” l.c.; comp. Gen. xiv. 1-17).
Those who identify Nimrod with Marduk, however, object that the name of Izdubar must be read, as is now generally conceded, “Gilgamesh,” and that the signs which constitute the name of Marduk, who also is represented as a hunter, are read phonetically “Amar Ud”; and ideographically they may be read “Namr Ud”—in Hebrew “Nimrod.” The difficulty of reconciling the Biblical Nimrod, the son of Cush, with Marduk, the son of Ea, may be overcome by interpreting the Biblical words as meaning that Nimrod was a descendant of Cush.
Two prominent theories are now held in regard to Nimrod’s identity:
One, adopted by G. Smith and Jeremias, is that Nimrod is to be identified with the Babylonian hero Izdubar or Gishdubar (Gilgamesh).
The second, that of Sayce,Pinches, and others, identifies Nimrod with Marduk, the Babylonian Mercury. The former identification is based on the fact that Izdubar is represented in the Babylonian epos as a mighty hunter, always accompanied by four dogs, and as the founder of the first great kingdom in Asia.
By the Arabs Nimrod is considered as the supreme example of the tyrant (“al-jabbar”). There is some confusion among Arabian historians as to Nimrod’s genealogy. According to one authority he was the son of Mash the son of Aram, and consequently a Semite; he built the Tower of Babel and also a bridge over the Euphrates, and reigned five hundred years over the Nabatæans, his kinsmen.
But the general opinion is that he was a Hamite, son of Canaan the son of Cush, or son of Cush the son of Canaan (Ṭabari gives both); that he was born at the time of Reu (a bright idea), and was the first to establish fire-worship.
Another legend is to the effect that there were two Nimrods:
1. The first was the son of Cush.
2. The second was the well-known tyrant and contemporary of Abraham; he was the son of Canaan and therefore a great-grandson of the first Nimrod. According to Mas’udi (“Muruj al-Dhahab,” ii. 96), Nimrod was the first Babylonian king, and during a reign of sixty years he dug many canals in ‘Irak.
The Koran says: After these adventures Nimrod continued to reign wickedly. Four hundred years later an angel in the form of a man appeared to him and exhorted him to repent, but Nimrod declared that he himself was sole ruler and challenged God to fight with him. Nimrod asked for a delay of three days, during which he gathered a considerable army; but this was exterminated by swarms of gnats. One of these insects is said to have entered Nimrod’s nose, reached the chambers of his brain, and gnawed at it. To allay the pain Nimrod ordered some one to strike with a hammer upon an anvil, in order that the noise might cause the gnat to cease gnawing (comp. the same story in connection with Titus in Giṭ. 56b). Nimrod died after forty years’ suffering.
Taken from wikipedia
10And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.
11Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,
Babel means “Gateway to God” but it will mean “Confusion” very quickly and we will see the birth of the Babylonian Empire.
Nimrod also founded the Assyrian Empire as well. Nineveh was it’s capitol.
Both Baylon and Assyria would cause great trouble for Israel later on.
Assyria carried away the 10 tribes of Israel into captivity in 722 B.C.
The Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem 130 years later in 586 B.C.
Genesis Chapter 10: The Table of Nations Part 1 December 2, 2008
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Genesis Bible Study.Tags: Genesis, Genesis 10, Genesis Bible Study, God, Ham, Japheth, Jesus Christ, Shem, The Bible, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
Genesis 10 – The Table of Nations Part 1
1Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
The thing to take note here before we begin is that this is not to divide the races and people but to see just how the earth was repopulated and that all came from Noah and to the extent from Adam
Acts 17
24God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
The Descendants of Japheth
2The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
3And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
4And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
5By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.
Here are some of Japheth’s descendants
1 Chronicles 1
5The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
6And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
7And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
Gomer, thought to be the father of the Sumerians
Ashkenaz – Modern day Germany
Magog and Tubal – Modern day Russia
And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal and prophesy against him, and say, Thus saith the Lord God: Behold I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: and I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armor, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet: Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.(Ezekiel 38:16)
Many ancient sources have identified “Magog” as the “Scythians”
which were the ancestors of the Russians. In the 5th century B.C. Herodotus of Harlicarnassus, known as “Father of History” wrote about them, and how they terrorized the southern steepes of Russia from the 10th century B.C. to the 3rd Century B.C.
Arab writers confirm that in the Arabic language their name for the Great Wall of China is called “the Wall of Al Magog” and it was created to keep these savage people out of their country
Madai – This refers to the Medes and Persians (mentioned in Daniel) and points to present day Iran
Javan – Modern day Greece
Tiras – Italy
Meshech – Moscow
Riphath, and Togarmah – Turkey, Togarmah possibly being the Armenians
Tarshish – Spain or England
Kittim – Cyprus
And we see that initially the European peoples are born out of the lineage of Japheth and this points eventually England and the Caucasian race and what is known of as the Gentile nation
Genesis Chapter 9:24-27 – The Sons of Noah December 1, 2008
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Genesis Bible Study.Tags: Genesis, Genesis 9, Genesis Bible Study, God, God and Man, Ham, Japheth, Jesus Christ, Noah, Shem, The Bible, The Holy Spirit, THe Sons of Noah
add a comment
Genesis 9 v24-27 – The Sons of Noah
24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
1. Concerning Ham and Canaan
25And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Canaan would be in general, a servant of the seed of Shem and Japheth.
Joshua, David, and Solomon (descendants of Shem) subdued them.
Alexander the Great and the Romans (descendants of Japheth) subdued them.
The Hamitic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s well-being
2) They are responsible for the technical proficiency of mankind
Arthur C. Custance states that all the earliest civilizations of note were founded and carried to the highest technical proficiency by the Hamitic peoples
Vol.1: Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions
PART IV
THE TECHNOLOGY OF HAMITIC PEOPLE
Publishing History:
1960 Doorway paper No. 43, published privately by Arthur C. Custance
1975 Part IV in Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions, vol.1 in The Doorway Papers Series,
1997 Arthur Custance Online Library (html)
2001 2nd Online Edition (corrections, design revisions)
INTRODUCTION
IF YOU enjoy reading catalogues now and then, you will probably enjoy this Paper, although it is dull indeed if read merely as literature. But if treated as intended, namely, as a list of technical achievements, it may come as a surprise to find how many, how varied, and how fundamental have been the inventions of Hamitic people, and how great a service they have rendered to mankind in the field of technology.
Hitherto our ethnocentrism in the writing of history has obscured this fact, but we now have a sufficient and ever-growing body of documented materials to justify this presentation.
Some of these achievements may be considered slight by those who have never actually contributed anything new to the sum total of human invention. But one should not be deceived by simplicity: it may be the hallmark of genius. It could also be argued that if we can only point to one invention of note in some particular tribe, that people can hardly be termed inventive. However, if we have only mentioned one invention that does not mean it was their sole achievement. It was mentioned only because it illustrated a particular aspect of native ingenuity.
2. Concerning Shem
26And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
Here we see a special favor given to Shem’s descendants, beginning with Abraham and ending with the greatest blessing – Jesus Christ!!!
The Semitic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s spiritual well-being
2) They are responsible for developing the major religions
At least three of the major religions spring out of Shem – Judaism, Islamism, and Christianity
3. Concerning Japheth
27God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
The Japhetic people have contributed 2 things to the world:
1) They are responsible for man’s mental well-being.
2) They are responsible for the scientific development of mankind especially in the area of philosophy
Since 539 B.C., with the defeat of the Babylonians by Cyrus the Great, no Semetic or Hamitic race has succeeded in breaking the world supremacy of the Japhethic race
Romans 11
13For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
14If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them.
15For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
16For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.
17And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.
20Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.
24For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?
25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Here are some other things worth mentioning per Arthur Custance
Part I: The Part Played by Shem, Ham and Japheth in Subsequent World History
Chapter 1
The Threefold Framework as Reflected in Scripture
1. Abraham’s Three Wives
Abraham had three wives. The first was Sarah, a daughter of Shem (Genesis11:29). The second was Hagar, the Egyptian, a daughter of Ham (Genesis16:3). The third was Keturah (Genesis 25:1). According to Hebrew tradition (presumably based upon genealogical records preserved in the Temple prior to their destruction by fire in A.D. 70, records which were priceless to the Jewish people, particularly where Abraham was concerned), Keturah (4) was descended in the line of Japheth.
It may be pointed out that in Genesis 10 the sons of Noah when grouped together are habitually put in the same order — Shem, Ham, and Japheth — although it is not absolutely certain that this is the order in which they were born. As will be seen with reference to Abraham’s wives, this order is preserved. The implication of Scripture seems to be that in Abraham, the father of the faithful and the father of many nations, the whole race was in a unique way united into a single family. The subsequent events of Hagar’s life in no way alter the fact that she had become a wife to Abraham.
2. The Three Synoptic Gospels
In the New Testament recognition of this threefold division is consistently accorded. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are termed synoptic because they deal with the events of our Lord’s life in a way quite distinct from the Gospel of John. It has always been recognized that these three Gospels form a mosaic.
It has been observed from the time of the earliest commentaries that Matthew presents a picture of the Lord Jesus Christ as King, and wrote his Gospel primarily with the Jewish people in mind. The opening genealogy traces this King, appropriately, back to David and to Abraham. His Gospel is full of references to the Old Testament and continually points out how this or that event was a fulfilment of prophecy. This was a message directed primarily to the children of Shem.
Remembering the order in which the sons of Noah are always given, one might logically expect that the second Gospel, Mark’s, was directed to the children of Ham. We believe that it is. In considering this aspect of the subject, it is very easy to introduce the ideal of racial superiority, for Mark wrote his Gospel with the clear intent of portraying our Lord as a Servant of mankind. In doing this, he may either be thought to have degraded the Lord to the level of a servant or elevated the servant to the position of God’s Anointed. The former view which seems the most obvious, is most false. One is reminded of Luther’s hymn, which points out that he who sweeps a floor as unto the Lord makes both the floor and the action “fine.” This is a wonderful truth. That the children of Ham have been servants par excellence to mankind (5) — have in fact habitually served mankind better than they served themselves — is not to degrade them but to acknowledge a debt which we, with our ethnocentric pride, have been slow to admit. As we have already said, this is a point to be considered more fully.
That Mark wrote from this point of view seems clear. There is no genealogy of the Lord. A servant is known by his service, not by his pedigree. Mark is full of such phrases as immediately, straightway, forthwith, etc. This Man commanded power. It is a striking thing that the gods of Hamitic people on the whole were gods of power, whereas the God of Shem was pre-eminently moral, and the gods of Japheth were gods of illumination. Mark’s Gospel is a Gospel of doing, of ceaseless activity. There are some references to the sublime position of a servant which are not found in the other Gospels. (6) Here and there Mark refers to people as servants where the other Gospels omit the fact, and Mark himself is singled out elsewhere as of particular service to Paul.
Luke’s Gospel was clearly written for the Gentiles. It appears traditionally that the term Gentile was reserved for the children of Japheth. This is reflected in Genesis 10:5, which we shall examine a little more fully subsequently. In Genesis 9:27 the text reads, “God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem.” This occurred when the Jewish people committed national suicide by rejecting their King. The Kingdom was taken from them (Matthew 21:43) and the responsibility for its administration was given to Japheth. But this is a temporary arrangement, and when “the times of the Gentiles” (Luke 21:24) are fulfilled, the original division of responsibilities will be restored.
Luke wrote for these Gentiles. Being himself Greek, this was an appropriate divine appointment. In his Gospel, the genealogy of the Lord, quite properly, goes back to Adam, and the characteristic delineation of the Lord is as “Son of Man.”
5. Servant of Servants: for evidence that this phrase is not one of degradation as commonly assumed, see “Why Noah Cursed Canaan Instead of Ham”, Part III in Noah’s Three Sons, vol.1 in The Doorway Papers Series. LINK
6. Mark’s unique reference to the place of “service,” is found in Mark 10:44. He himself is referred to as a particularly valuable minister, by Paul in 2 Timothy 4:11.
It is also worthy of note that the name Japheth means “fair” or “light,” as the word Ham means “dark” (not necessarily black). The word Luke also means “fair” or “light.”
So we have three synoptic Gospels which, by many internal evidences far too numerous to enter into here, seem clearly to have been written under divine direction specifically for Shem, Ham, and Japheth ? in this order. It is not certain, of course, that the actual text of each Gospel was completed in this chronological order, but the fact remains that God has seen to it that they should be preserved for us from the earliest times in the order in which we find them today. There is no direct evidence, as far as I know, that the writers or the receivers were conscious of this association, but the association surely is clear.
Genesis Chapter 9 – Sin in the Tent November 26, 2008
Posted by Clint Rodgers in Genesis Bible Study.Tags: Genesis, Genesis 9, Genesis Bible Study, God, God and Man, Ham, Japheth, Jesus Christ, Noah, Shem, Sin, The Holy Spirit
add a comment
Genesis 9 – Sin in the Tent
22And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
It is interesting to note here that mankind has been pretty much the same way for all time. Here we see Ham, one of the sons of Noah, seeing his father’s nakedness in the tent, and what does he do? He runs to spread the gossip. He gets a good laugh and shares it with his brothers.
Who would be at fault here, when we get down to the bottom of all that has happened. Noah has become drunk and something odd, something not right is either able to be seen (his nakedness) or something has happened here in this tent. Noah has become earthy and he has in totality opened the door to sin and caused his sons to possibly follow suit.
Ham is hamming it up here, making a spectacle of his father in such a bad shape.
Ham saw his father’s nakedness in his tent. Those closest to us see our weaknesses and we see other’s as we get closer to them and bond with them. And then sometimes we start to see only the flaws.
What do we do? How do we react to these situations?
When someone does something that is flawed, when I see the cracks in others.
What do I do when I see sin in other’s tents?
Look at the different reactions of the brothers
22And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
23And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.
Ham runs and tells his brothers about their father. Shem and Japheth take a garment, lay it upon their shoulders, and as they walk backward, cover up their father.
The difference is the reaction, the intent of the heart.
So many times we are all too eager to talk about others. We are all too eager to gossip or to knock someone else down a notch and make ourselves feel better rather than keep our mouths shut!
We should talk about problems, our problems and not others and we can raise questions or share burdens with each other about others but when we start talking ABOUT someone instead of praying for them or trying to help them, we are headed for trouble
Galatians 6
1Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
2Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.
In those times it was considered disrespectful to look upon or see another’s nakedness. The ancient Hebrew says that Ham “told with delight” what he saw. He thought it was funny and he brought possible disrespect to the whole family.
His brothers covered their father, they had respect for their father.
1 Peter 4
8And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins
Proverbs 10:12
Hatred stirs up strife, But LOVE COVERS all sins.
Romans 4:7
“Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, And whose SINS ARE COVERED;
And we need to be like the older brothers. We need to be covering, loving when we see other people’s sin in their tent, in their body physically and in the body, the church.
24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
Some believe that Ham just saw his father’s nakedness and that he made sport of it, he hammed it up.
Others believe that he performed castration on his father to keep him from having more children
The Legends of the Jews
by Louis Ginzberg
In his drunken condition Noah betook himself to the tent of his wife. His son Ham saw him there, and he told his brothers what he had noticed, and said: “The first man had but two sons, and one slew the other; this man Noah has three sons, yet he desires to beget a fourth besides.” Nor did Ham rest satisfied with these disrespectful words against his father. He added to this sin of irreverence the still greater outrage of attempting to perform an operation upon his father designed to prevent procreation.
Some think that the sin was homosexuality
Some think that it was an incestuous relationship with his mother
25And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Generational curses
Many times sin is passed down, not just by genes or by nature but through examples.
One does wonder if perhaps Canaan was also involved
Ezekiel 18
1The word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,
2What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge?
3As I live, saith the Lord GOD, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel.
4Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
And yet he might not have done anything but feel the unfortunate repercussions from the sin of his father. Some believe that this was because Noah and his sons had already been blessed by God and so could not be cursed
Noah’s Three Sons
by Arthur C. Custance
The Curse on Ham’s Son
It has always been a matter of controversy as to why Canaan rather than Ham should have been cursed. Canaan was Ham’s son, and was therefore grandson to Noah. Some people have supposed that the name Canaan was substituted for Ham by Jewish scribes who had particularly strong feelings against this branch of Ham’s family. Evidence for this is believed to be provided by some manuscripts of the Septuagint and the Arabic versions, which have the words “Ham, the father of Canaan” instead of the word “Canaan” alone.
There is another explanation which seems to me more probable and which, if it is true, means that Noah really was cursing Ham. It is a common social custom among many primitive people to attribute the greatness of a son to the father, who then receives the honour for having raised such a worthy child. This is clearly reflected in Scripture where Saul seeks to honour David after the slaying of Goliath. He asks his general whose son the lad is (1 Sam. 17:55). This has always seemed to mean that he did not recognize David, which would seem strange in view of David’s close associations with him. Undoubtedly Saul knew David well enough, but evidently did not know who his father was. And it was the father he was seeking to honour according to social custom.
A man, in blessing his own son, was in fact blessing himself. This was true when Noah blessed Shem and Japheth. By the same token, however, if he had cursed Ham, the real offender, he would at the same time have been cursing himself. Quite logically, he could only pass judgment upon Ham by cursing Ham’s own son, which is what he therefore did.
26And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
27God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
Shem
Shem means “glory”
He is the father of the Semite people, the Jewish and Arabic peoples. They settled primarily in the Middle East.
Ham
Depending upon the lexicon used, Ham means “black, or hot”
The Hamite people settled in Africa. Some believe that the curse on Canaan is the reason why the people of Africa were enslaved
The Legends of the Jews
by Louis Ginzberg
When Noah awoke from his wine and became sober, he pronounced a curse upon Ham in the person of his youngest son Canaan. To Ham himself he could do no harm, for God had conferred a blessing upon Noah and his three sons as they departed from the ark. Therefore he put the curse upon the last-born son of the son that had prevented him from begetting a younger son than the three he had.” The descendants of Ham through Canaan therefore have red eyes, because Ham looked upon the nakedness of his father; they have misshapen lips, because Ham spoke with his lips to his brothers about the unseemly condition of his father; they have twisted curly hair, because Ham turned and twisted his head round to see the nakedness of his father; and they go about naked, because Ham did not cover the nakedness of his father. Thus he was requited, for it is the way of God to mete out punishment measure for measure.
This would not be the case though because Canaan was the cursed one and not all of the Hamite people. Canaan’s descendants were so perverted and polluted that God ordered their annihilation in order to put them out of their misery
Japheth
His name means “Ruler” and his people settled mostly in Europe
We will be able to look at each son a little better in the next chapter
28And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
29And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.
And as we looked at before, Noah’s last years did not seem to match the glory of his first ones.